Comments on: Deferred Lighting http://www.gamerendering.com/2008/11/01/deferred-lightning/ Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:10:53 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5 hourly 1 By: k1DBLITZ http://www.gamerendering.com/2008/11/01/deferred-lightning/comment-page-1/#comment-5856 k1DBLITZ Sun, 06 Feb 2011 06:45:54 +0000 http://www.gamerendering.com/?p=434#comment-5856 Thanks for the write up. The Frostbite 2.0 engine being developed by DICE supports deferred lighting, so I had to see what it was all about. Thanks for the write up. The Frostbite 2.0 engine being developed by DICE supports deferred lighting, so I had to see what it was all about.

]]> By: Jesse Klugmann http://www.gamerendering.com/2008/11/01/deferred-lightning/comment-page-1/#comment-3466 Jesse Klugmann Sun, 14 Mar 2010 11:10:40 +0000 http://www.gamerendering.com/?p=434#comment-3466 I think the z-pre pass renderer is faster and better than a deferred renderer.Additionally a z-pre pass renderer runs on a machine with low specs and has also a good quality.With a deferred renderer you have also problems with transparency and some special effects.So... PS : Sry for my really bad english!!! =D I think the z-pre pass renderer is faster and better than a deferred renderer.Additionally a z-pre pass renderer runs on a machine with low specs and has also a good quality.With a deferred renderer you have also problems with transparency and some special effects.So…

PS : Sry for my really bad english!!! =D

]]>