<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Deferred Lighting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gamerendering.com/2008/11/01/deferred-lightning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gamerendering.com/2008/11/01/deferred-lightning/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 21:19:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jesse Klugmann</title>
		<link>http://www.gamerendering.com/2008/11/01/deferred-lightning/comment-page-1/#comment-3466</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse Klugmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 11:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gamerendering.com/?p=434#comment-3466</guid>
		<description>I think the z-pre pass renderer is faster and better than a deferred renderer.Additionally a z-pre pass renderer runs on a machine with low specs and has also a good quality.With a deferred renderer you have also problems with transparency and some special effects.So...

PS : Sry for my really bad english!!! =D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the z-pre pass renderer is faster and better than a deferred renderer.Additionally a z-pre pass renderer runs on a machine with low specs and has also a good quality.With a deferred renderer you have also problems with transparency and some special effects.So&#8230;</p>
<p>PS : Sry for my really bad english!!! =D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
